3.31.2009

"Has anyone ever told you..."

J-P has one of those faces that always seems to remind people of some celebrity. (Meanwhile, if I remind people of someone, it's always their sister's friend or their college hallmate or something. Never anyone remotely glamorous.) But for all of the celebrity comparisons J-P hears, people never seem to agree on which celebrity he resembles. It's always someone new. (Though, inevitably, always someone good-looking.) For example:

Ralph Fiennes --


Jay Mohr --


Michael Vartan --


Tony Hawk --


Paul Bettany --


Among these, I have my favorites, and I think some are totally off-the-wall. But before I introduce any bias into this (highly-scientific) sample, what do you all think?

3.23.2009

S*ci@!i$m is not a dirty word

In this post, I wade into the thicket of political philosophy, despite the fact that it's not a subject in which I'm particularly well-versed. (But when has that ever stopped me before?) I've probably made some major over-simplifications in what follows, and possibly some misstatements. And I know that several of you (you know who you are) could easily argue me under the table, so please be nice to me.

***

When I joined Facebook, I included on my profile page a reference to being a "socialist." With quotation marks.

Why the quotes? A friend asked. Has Joe the Plumber gotten to me?

Not at all. The reason for the quotes? On the one hand, I don't really consider myself a socialist. But, on the other hand, a lot of people, Joe the Proverbial Plumber included, probably would.

According to Wikipedia,

Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and an egalitarian society characterized by equal opportunities for all individuals and a fair or egalitarian distribution of wealth.

That's obviously a wildly simplistic definition, and there are many variations of political belief that fall under the umbrella of socialism.

What kills me, though, is conservatives' insistence on branding everyone with beliefs that lean to the left of center or that even hint at the government regulation of the market economy a socialist. I, for one, think that capitalism is the most effective economic means of creating wealth -- of biggening the pie -- and that biggening the pie is fundamentally a good thing. And I'm know I'm not alone among liberals / progressives / etc. in this belief. I'm also pretty sure that this belief places me outside the umbrella of traditional socialism. But that won't stop people from hurling that word at me and others, ignoring its true meaning, simply because I believe that the free market is not perfect and needs some regulation to prevent its excesses from running amok. (I mean seriously, people, have we not LEARNED ANYTHING these last few months?!?)

Which gets me to my second point. Despite the progress we like to think we've made over the last fifty years, it appears that the spirit of McCarthyism is alive and well, since the specter of socialism is still so often wielded as a weapon. Now, one might legitimately disagree about whether socialism in practice is functional, one might disagree with its ends, one might disagree with its means. But that disagreement does not render those who believe in socialism EVIL. It might well render them WRONG, but that's a different thing altogether.

Looking back at that definition again, particularly the part that talks about "an egalitarian society characterized by equal opportunities for all individuals and a fair or egalitarian distribution of wealth," that sounds like a fair and worthy goal. And I am quite certain that government must play a role to help nudge the markets in that direction, because they most certainly will not go there on their own. Now, I'm familiar with the old argument that social ills -- racism and sexism, to name just a few -- will not survive in a truly free market. But the problem is, markets are not truly free. Among other shortcomings, they are run by humans -- fallible, imperfect humans -- who don't always act in a stricly utilitarian fashion. And so, although worthy goals such as eliminating racism and sexism might well be a smart move economically, the Powers That Be may be disinclined to do so for reasons that economics can't account for.

And if all of that makes me a "socialist," with quotations or without, then so be it. But don't delude yourself into thinking I'm offended by that in the slightest.

***

One last thought: I recently came across a comment from someone who was upset with the new administration's "socialist" tendencies. His response? To threaten to move to Canada. Which...wha huh who'd you say what now? Do you know ANYTHING about Canada? Please pardon me as I bang my head on the wall repeatedly.

3.17.2009

Call me O'Grinchy

I'm wearing green pants today, but not on purpose. And I'm not sure if they even count as green. J-P swears they're brown. Then again, he's half colorblind, so I'm not sure I can trust his judgment.

Anyway, the fact is that I can be a bit of a St. Patty's day grinch (no green shirt! no green hat! definitely no green beer!). But I'm still enjoying the idea that any one of us can revel in the St. Patty's day festivities at McSorley's, in real time, thanks to the marvels of modern technology.

It's almost like being there.

Or not.

3.11.2009

Satire imitating life imitating satire

Stephen Colbert, circa 2006:
I know the Pope's infallible, but that doesn't mean he can't make mistakes.

New York Times, Mar. 11, 2009:
In Letter to Bishops, Pope Admits Mistakes

3.05.2009

God must have the unlimited texting plan

Kurt Warner, quarterback for the Super Bowl runner-up Arizona Cardinals, is in contract negotiations with the Cardinals. In the middle of these negotiations, he takes a little trip to San Francisco to visit with the 49ers. Worried about losing him, Arizona ups their offer to guarantee Warner $19 million rather than the $10 million guaranteed that had been on the table. Warner decides to stay in Arizona.

Cynics Realists say: The trip was just a ploy to give Warner leverage in his negotiations with Arizona.

Warner says: He was genuinely interested in the 49ers, but in the end, God told him to stay in Arizona.

Well, I call bullshit. I hate that people throw around "God told me to," or "it was God's will," or whatever, like that's supposed to end the conversation and make it impossible to question the speaker's motives.

Warner wants us to believe that God told him to stay in Arizona?

Bullshit.

God, and $9 million.